logo
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Firm
    • Our People
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
  • Practice Areas
    • Environmental Law
    • Municipal & Public Agency Law
    • Clean Energy Law
    • Local Ballot Measures
    • Tribal Law
    • Litigation & Appeals
  • News
    • Updates and Articles
    • Where We Work
  • Legal Hiring
  • Contact Us
Search For

415-552-7272

logo
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Firm
    • Our People
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
  • Practice Areas
    • Environmental Law
    • Municipal & Public Agency Law
    • Clean Energy Law
    • Local Ballot Measures
    • Tribal Law
    • Litigation & Appeals
  • News
    • Updates and Articles
    • Where We Work
  • Legal Hiring
  • Contact Us
Search For

415-552-7272

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Firm
    • Our People
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
  • Practice Areas
    • Environmental Law
    • Municipal & Public Agency Law
    • Clean Energy Law
    • Local Ballot Measures
    • Tribal Law
    • Litigation & Appeals
  • News
    • Updates and Articles
    • Where We Work
  • Legal Hiring
  • Contact Us
SM&W logo

Updates and Articles

Environmental Review Required for Wetland Fill Permit

On behalf of Save the Bay and other environmental groups, the firm, together with the Attorney General's office, prevails in a federal case holding that the Army Corps of Engineers must prepare an environmental impact statement for a permit to fill wetlands at the Oakland Airport site. (People of State of Calif. v. Marsh, 687 F.Supp. 495 (1988).)

Read More
Our WorkNovember 25, 1988

Big Win for Marin County’s Agriculture Zoning

The Ninth Circuit rejects the expansion of urban land uses into Marin County's “beautiful rural landscape,” holding that the landowner's facial challenge and equal protection claim are barred by the statute of limitations and the County's zoning is neither arbitrary or irrational. (Barancik v. County of Marin, 872 F.2d 834 (9th Cir. 1988).)

Read More
Our WorkNovember 25, 1988

Court of Appeal Rejects Redevelopment Agency’s Determination That Agricultural Area Is Blighted

The firm prevails in challenging a redevelopment plan that would have allowed industrial uses on productive agricultural land in Solano County. The appellate court reverses the trial court, holding that the Agency's approval violated both the Community Redevelopment Law and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (Emmington v. Solano County Redev't Agency, 195 Cal.App.3d 491 (1987).)

Read More
Our WorkNovember 25, 1987

Court Halts Development on Cullinan Ranch in Solano County

The firm prevails in litigation challenging major development on Cullinan Ranch, a 1,500-acre parcel at the top of San Pablo Bay. This large wetland area is now permanently preserved by the Fish & Wildlife Service. (Save the Bay v. City of Vallejo.)

Read More
Our WorkSeptember 10, 1987

SMW Joins Individuals and Local Agencies in Opposing State’s Approval of Timber Harvest Plan

The Firm makes repeated trips to the Court of Appeal to extend the restraining order it obtained barring logging of redwood trees on property located on Lucas Valley Road in Marin County. Redwood trees prevail as a settlement is eventually reached with the forester. (County of Marin v. California Department of Forestry (1985).)

Read More
Our WorkNovember 25, 1985

Court Halts Construction Impacting Tribal Resources

On behalf of the Colorado River Indian Tribes, the firm obtains an injunction in federal court to prevent the issuance of permits for construction along a riverbank that will harm cultural resources. (Colorado River Indian Tribes v. Marsh, 605 F.Supp.1425 (1985).)

Read More
Our WorkOctober 8, 1985

SMW Helps Residents Reduce Orange County Airport Impacts

In 1985 the firm negotiates an innovative settlement of litigation on behalf of Stop Polluting Our Newport and the Airport Working Group, challenging the expansion of John Wayne Airport in Orange County. The settlement establishes strict limits on the number of commercial flights, aircraft noise levels, and terminal size at John Wayne, considered to be the most stringent set of restrictions on airport operations in the nation.

Read More
Our WorkSeptember 14, 1985

Court Halts Development of Odello Ranch in Monterey County

The firm succeeds in litigation challenging the Coastal Commission's approval of sprawl development on Odello Ranch, a stunning rural area south of the Carmel River. (City of Carmel By-the-Sea v. California Coastal Commission (1985).)

Read More
Our WorkSeptember 10, 1985

Ninth Circuit Halts Development at Lake Tahoe

On behalf of the League to Save Lake Tahoe, the firm, together with the state Attorney General's office, obtains a federal court injunction, affirmed by the Ninth Circuit, prohibiting the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) from issuing development permits. As a result, TRPA enters a public process to prepare a new regional plan protecting Lake Tahoe. (People of State of Calif. v. TRPA, 766 F.2d 1319 (9th Cir. 1985).)

Read More
Our WorkSeptember 10, 1985

Bay Conservation and Development Commission Authority Affirmed

The firm represents Save the Bay as an intervenor in an appellate case affirming the authority of the Bay Conservation & Development Commission (BCDC) to hold a landowner responsible for unauthorized bay fill on its property. (Leslie Salt Co. v. BCDC, 153 Cal.App.3d 605 (1984).)

Read More
Our WorkNovember 25, 1984

Decades After Hard Fought Battle with Developer, Park Visitors Are Beneficiaries of Settlement Agreement

With the firm's assistance, residents of Coldwater Canyon in the Santa Monica Mountains successfully scale back a large development project, resulting in the creation of Coldwater Canyon Park. The Park is home to TreePeople's headquarters, a nursery, conference center, amphitheater and miles of trails.

Read More
Our WorkNovember 25, 1984

Solano County Voters Pass Initiative to Protect Agricultural Land

In 1984 the firm drafts a farmland protection initiative for Solano County, and successfully defends it in court. Measure A becomes a model for land use initiatives throughout the state.

Read More
Our WorkSeptember 10, 1984
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
Search For

In the Public Interest

An e-newsletter from Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger offering timely legal news and analysis for public agencies.

Categories

  • Accomplishments
  • Firm News
  • Our Work
  • Press Release
  • Public Agency Update

Tags

Additional Environmental Law Expertise Antitrust CEQA & NEPA City Attorney & General Counsel Services Clean Energy Law Climate Change & Air Quality Constitutional Law Diversity Equity & Inclusion Environmental Justice Environmental Law Housing Land Trusts & Natural Resource Conservation Land Use Planning & Zoning Litigation & Appeals Local Ballot Measures - Drafting Local Ballot Measures - Litigation Municipal & Public Agency Law Municipal Finance Parks & Recreation Planning & Project Management Services Public Contracting Public Trust and Coasts & Waters Real Estate Transactions & Eminent Domain Recycling & Waste Management Regulatory Takings Renewable Energy Siting Proceedings SMW at 40 Transportation & Infrastructure Projects Tribal Law - Cultural Resource Protection Tribal Law - Tribal Jurisdiction & Governance
default logo

Counsel and representation in government, land use, renewable energy, and environmental legal matters for public agencies, non-profits, tribes, and community groups.

Quick Links

  • Our Firm
  • Our People
  • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
  • News
  • Legal Hiring
  • Contact Us
  • Celebrating 40 Years
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Opt-out preferences

Practice Areas

  • Environmental Law
  • Municipal and Public Agency Law
  • Clean Energy Law
  • Local Ballot Measures
  • Tribal Law
  • Litigation and Appeals

Office

Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP

396 Hayes Street

San Francisco, CA 94102

By Phone: (415) 552-7272

By Email: info@smwlaw.com

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
DEI Seal

© 2025 Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP, All Rights Reserved

Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
Preferences
{title} {title} {title}