logo
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Firm
    • Our People
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
  • Practice Areas
    • Environmental Law
    • Municipal & Public Agency Law
    • Clean Energy Law
    • Local Ballot Measures
    • Tribal Law
    • Litigation & Appeals
  • News
    • Updates and Articles
    • Where We Work
  • Legal Hiring
  • Contact Us
Search For

415-552-7272

logo
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Firm
    • Our People
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
  • Practice Areas
    • Environmental Law
    • Municipal & Public Agency Law
    • Clean Energy Law
    • Local Ballot Measures
    • Tribal Law
    • Litigation & Appeals
  • News
    • Updates and Articles
    • Where We Work
  • Legal Hiring
  • Contact Us
Search For

415-552-7272

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Firm
    • Our People
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
  • Practice Areas
    • Environmental Law
    • Municipal & Public Agency Law
    • Clean Energy Law
    • Local Ballot Measures
    • Tribal Law
    • Litigation & Appeals
  • News
    • Updates and Articles
    • Where We Work
  • Legal Hiring
  • Contact Us

California Supreme Court Sheds Light on How Public Agencies Should Manage E-Communications Consistent with the California Public Records Act

March 1, 2017

On Thursday, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in City of San Jose v. Superior Court, holding that writings that concern public business may be subject to the California Public Records Act (CPRA) even if they are sent and received using private accounts.

Recommended Best Practices

The Court highlighted how public agencies, employees, elected representatives, and other officials can manage their communications to comply with its holding while protecting privacy rights. Consistent with the decision, we recommend that agencies:

  • Adopt e-communications policies that direct agency personnel to use their government accounts for the conduct of public business;
  • Conduct trainings regarding what constitutes a “public business” and, by extension, a public record;
  • Discourage the use of private accounts—including email, text, and social media—for the conduct of public business;
  • Adopt internal policies and procedures for responding to CPRA requests; and
  • Review records retention policies to ensure that they include procedures to manage e-communications on public and, if applicable, private accounts.

Agencies that take these steps should be well prepared to meet their CPRA obligations going forward. In doing so, agency officials can avoid “email problems” that have gained national media attention in recent years.

Guideposts to Differentiate Between Public Records and Private Communications

The petitioner in the City of San Jose case requested documents pursuant to the CPRA—including emails and texts sent or received on private devices used by the mayor, two city council members, and their staffs—that related to a downtown redevelopment project.

The Court emphasized that the CPRA applies to communications that “relate in some substantive way” to public business, but not to “primarily personal” communications. To guide future, fact-specific inquiries of what qualifies as a “public record,” the Court identified several relevant factors:

  1. the content of the communication;
  2. the context in, or purpose for which, it was written;
  3. the audience to whom it was directed; and
  4. whether the author was acting or purporting to act within the scope of public employment.

Thus, using the Court’s example, an email to a spouse complaining “my coworker is an idiot” is unlikely to constitute a public record. On the other hand, an email to a superior regarding the same colleague’s handling of an agency project might well be a public record. Officials should thus be mindful of whether they are communicating in a public or private capacity and of the potential reach of the PRA.

Going forward, agencies should take the opportunity to review both communications and record retention policies in light of the Court’s decision and in anticipation of future CPRA requests.

For more information, contact SMW attorneys Sarah Sigman (sigman@smwlaw.com) or Catherine Engberg (engberg@smwlaw.com).

State Lawmakers Limit Local Control of Accessory Dwelling UnitsPrev
Defending Local Control of Land UseNext
default logo

Counsel and representation in government, land use, renewable energy, and environmental legal matters for public agencies, non-profits, tribes, and community groups.

Quick Links

  • Our Firm
  • Our People
  • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
  • News
  • Legal Hiring
  • Contact Us
  • Celebrating 40 Years
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Opt-out preferences

Practice Areas

  • Environmental Law
  • Municipal and Public Agency Law
  • Clean Energy Law
  • Local Ballot Measures
  • Tribal Law
  • Litigation and Appeals

Office

Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP

396 Hayes Street

San Francisco, CA 94102

By Phone: (415) 552-7272

By Email: info@smwlaw.com

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
DEI Seal

© 2025 Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP, All Rights Reserved

Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
Preferences
{title} {title} {title}